Intro

Welcome to our Military Disability blog! We encourage participation. Please feel free to comment on any post, including questions. We want to make sure we give you the information you need, so feel free to ask us anything about military disability, and we'll add it to our blog queu.

Our goal for this blog is to jump deeper into specific issues than we can on our website, www.MilitaryDisabilityMadeEasy.com. The site should still be the first place you go, though. It has an immense amount of information, and should be able to address the majority of your questions very well. If not, please let us know.

Below on the right, you'll see that you can sign up to follow our posts via email or via RSS feed. Keep informed!

Last but not least, this blog is going to deal just strictly with the specifics of the Military Disability system that is functioning right now. You might also want to follow our Top News stories for all current news about and future plans for the disability system.

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

The VA’s Agent Orange Policy Change: Personnel who Worked on Contaminated C-123s Now Eligible for VA Disability

As of June 19, 2015 service members and reservists who served on contaminated C-123s from 1969 to 1986 are now able to qualify for VA Disability if they have developed one of the conditions on the VA Presumptive List for Agent Orange exposure.

This is a much-awaited change that we are very glad to finally see in place. After the Vietnam War, between 1,500 and 2,100 Air Force members and reservists were repeatedly in contact with the C-123s that had been used to deliver Agent Orange during the war.  Many of these people have since developed conditions that are known to be connected to Agent Orange exposure, but all their VA Disability Claims for compensation have been denied since the VA’s policy required service in Vietnam itself (or Korea) during the war.

This policy change came after a long campaign that resulted in a formal study done by the Institute of Medicine. The Institute determined that those who had “regular and repeated contact” with the planes were most likely exposed to enough Agent Orange residue to cause “adverse health consequences.”

The study provided enough evidence to convince the VA to change their Agent Orange policy to include any service member or reservist who had “regular and repeated contact” with one of these planes. This includes the flight crews, the ground maintenance crews, and the aero-medical personnel who worked on these planes.

See the VA's list of Air Force Speciality Codes and Units for specifics on exactly which service members and reservists qualify for C-123/Agent Orange exposure.

The reservists who served on these aircraft can also use their conditions caused by Agent Orange to qualify as veterans. To be considered a full veteran, and thus eligible for all VA Disability Benefits, a reservist must have been disabled while in active service. The VA now accepts the development of any of the presumptive conditions for Agent Orange in these reservists as proof that they developed a disability while in active service and thus qualify as veterans.


If you served on one of the contaminated C-123 aircrafts, you now fully qualify for VA Disability compensation if you have since developed one of the conditions on the VA Presumptive List. To receive your benefits, simply submit a new VA Disability Claim. Make sure to include proof that you did serve on a C-123 in one of the capacities noted above, and you should be good to go.  

5 comments:

  1. I am an Army veteran with a 50% disability rating from agent orange exposure while in Vietnam in 1966 - 67 (diabetes and coronary artery disease w/triple bypass/2010, and hearing loss). I also suffer from non - alcoholic cirrhosis with esophageal varices. In 2014 I suffered a rupture in my esophagus and required emergency surgery and spent five days in ICU on a ventilator, with numerous blood transfusions. Prior to this I filed for compensation for this condition (twice) and was denied both times. I also suffer from anemia. In October 2016, I had a total knee replacement due to osteoarthritis. In addition, I have arthritis in both feet. Under the VA expanded list of conditions for agent orange exposure, I find that anemia, cirrhosis, and degenerative arthritis are covered. I am confused whether the 90 day or one year after separation rules apply in my case. Obviously, none of my conditions were identified within either if those time frames. I was 24 when discharged and 54 when my diabetes and CAD were identified, sand I was granted disability. I am 73 now. I have always believed that my cirrhosis was due to exposure as well. Now with the anemia and arthritis I wonder if I have grounds to file for additional benefits? Tom Lewis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Tom -

      Where did you find this expanded Agent Orange list? It certainly isn't official. Officially, anemia, cirrhosis, and arthritis are NOT on the presumptive list for Agent Orange exposure.

      The 90-day rule does not apply to Agent Orange exposure, so that will not be an issue, but this conditions are not currently on the list.

      Delete

    2. This is the current official list:

      http://militarydisabilitymadeeasy.com/vapresumptivelist.html#herbicide

      Here is the same official list on the VA's site:

      https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/conditions/index.asp

      Delete
  2. I am an Army veteran with only 10% disability because of Tinnitus. I was denied disability for Keratoconus on both eyes because there was never any claim or any provider sought while I was in service. I've done further research and found the following, https://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files3/0614134.txt
    Citation Nr: 0614134. Let me know what else I can attach to my appeal before i submit it. Truly appreciate you advise and help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This case is definitely a good one to note on your appeal.

      It's a tricky situation since the law specifically states that if a condition is not diagnosed within 1 year of service, it does not qualify.

      In very special instances like this, however, there can be enough proof that the condition did exist, as the case states, "in a subclinical state" while in service.

      Citing this case alone may not be enough, however. The key to this case being successful was the opinions of his physicians. To strengthen your case, you need to get statements from your physicians that claim this same idea: the condition usually presents between these ages and the veteran was in service during this time, thus it was subclinical while in service. Etc.

      Delete